Table of Contents
This chapter describes the various replication features provided by MySQL. It introduces replication concepts, shows how to set up replication servers, and serves as a reference to the available replication options. It also provides a list of frequently asked questions (with answers), and troubleshooting advice for solving replication problems.
For a description of the syntax of replication-related SQL statements, see Section 13.6, “Replication Statements”.
We suggest that you visit our Web site at http://www.mysql.com frequently as well as check for revisions to this chapter. Replication is constantly being improved, and we update the manual regularly with the most current information.
MySQL features support for one-way, asynchronous replication, in which one server acts as the master, while one or more other servers act as slaves. (This is in contrast to the synchronous replication which is a characteristic of MySQL Cluster — see Chapter 17, MySQL Cluster.) The master server writes updates to its binary log files, and maintains an index of the files to keep track of log rotation. These logs serve as records of updates to be sent to any slave servers. When a slave connects to the master, it informs the master of the position up to which the slave read in the logs at the last successful update. The slave receives any updates that have taken place since that time, and then blocks and waits for the master to notify it of new updates.
A slave server can itself serve as a master if you want to set up chained replication servers.
Note that when you are using replication, all updates to the tables that are replicated should be performed on the master server. Otherwise, you must always be careful to avoid conflicts between updates that users make to tables on the master and updates that they make to tables on the slave. When performing updates on the slaves's side you should also keep in mind that these might work with statement-based replication, but not with row-based replication. Consider the following scenario, where a record is inserted on the slave, followed by a statement on the master's side that should empty the table:
slave> INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (1); master> DELETE FROM tbl;
The master doesn't know about the INSERT
operation on the slave server, but with statement-based
replication, tbl
will still be empty on both
master and slave as soon as the slave catches up with the master,
because the slave simply echoes the master's
DELETE
statement. With row-based replication,
however, the master will write to its binlog the rows that were
deleted in the master's table, and because it doesn't know about
the slave's operations, this will not include
the record inserted on the slave. As a consequence, replication
will break.
For information about row-based replication (RBR), see Section 6.3, “Row-Based Replication”.
One-way replication has benefits for robustness, speed, and system administration:
Robustness is increased with a master/slave setup. In the event of problems with the master, you can switch to the slave as a backup.
Better response time for clients can be achieved by splitting
the load for processing client queries between the master and
slave servers. SELECT
queries may be sent
to the slave to reduce the query processing load of the
master. Statements that modify data should still be sent to
the master so that the master and slave do not get out of
sync. This load-balancing strategy is effective if
non-updating queries dominate, but that is the normal case.
Another benefit of using replication is that you can perform backups using a slave server without disturbing the master. The master continues to process updates while the backup is being made. See Section 5.9.1, “Database Backups”.
MySQL replication is based on the master server keeping track of all changes to your databases (updates, deletes, and so on) in the binary logs. Therefore, to use replication, you must enable binary logging on the master server. See Section 5.11.3, “The Binary Log”.
Each slave server receives from the master the saved updates that the master has recorded in its binary log, so that the slave can execute the same updates on its copy of the data.
It is extremely important to realize that the binary log is simply a record starting from the fixed point in time at which you enable binary logging. Any slaves that you set up need copies of the databases on your master as they existed at the moment you enabled binary logging on the master. If you start your slaves with databases that are not in the same state as those on the master when the binary log was started, your slaves are quite likely to fail.
One way to copy the master's data to the slave is to use the
LOAD DATA FROM MASTER
statement. Be aware that
LOAD DATA FROM MASTER
currently works only if
all the tables on the master use the MyISAM
storage engine. In addition, this statement acquires a global read
lock, so no updates on the master are possible while the tables
are being transferred to the slave. When we implement lock-free
hot table backup, this global read lock will no longer be
necessary.
Due to these limitations, we recommend that at this point you use
LOAD DATA FROM MASTER
only if the dataset on
the master is relatively small, or if a prolonged read lock on the
master is acceptable. Although the actual speed of LOAD
DATA FROM MASTER
may vary from system to system, a good
rule of thumb for how long it takes is 1 second per 1MB of data.
This is a rough estimate, but you should find it fairly accurate
if both master and slave are equivalent to 700MHz Pentium CPUs in
performance and are connected through a 100Mbps network.
After the slave has been set up with a copy of the master's data,
it connects to the master and waits for updates to process. If the
master fails, or the slave loses connectivity with your master,
the slave keeps trying to connect periodically until it is able to
resume listening for updates. The retry interval is controlled by
the --master-connect-retry
option. The default is
60 seconds.
Each slave keeps track of where it left off. The master server has no knowledge of how many slaves there are or of which ones are up to date at any given time.
With MySQL's classic statement-based replication, there may be issues with replicating stored routines or triggers. You can avoid these issues by using MySQL's row-based replication (RBR) instead. For a detailed list of issues, see Section 20.4, “Binary Logging of Stored Routines and Triggers”.
Row-based replication is available as of MySQL 5.1.5.
If you're building MySQL from source, it must be compiled with the
--with-row-based-replication
switch to
configure in order to enable row-based
replication.
Even with row-based replication enabled, MySQL will still default to using statement-based replication. If you want to use row-based replication instead, you have to start the MySQL server with this option:
--binlog-format=row
This enables row-based replication
server-wide, and automatically turns on
innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog
as it is safe in
this case.
If you want to switch back to statement-based replication, restart
the server without the --binlog-format=row
option (statement-based replication is the default) or by
specifiying --binlog-format=statement
explicitly.
Here are two reasons why you would want to set replication logging on a per-connection basis:
A thread that does a lot of small changes to the database might want to use row-based logging, while a thread that does a lot of heavy-duty searching might want to use statement-based logging.
Some statements require a lot of execution on the master, but create a small result set. It might therefore be beneficial to replicated them row-based.
Row-based replication causes most changes to be written to the binary log using the row-based format. Some changes, however, will still be written into the binary log as statements:
ANALYZE
REPAIR
OPTIMIZE
There is another option you can use with row-based replication:
binlog-row-event-max-size
. Rows are stored into
the binlog in chunks not exceeding this value, which needs to be a
multiple of 256. If you don't specify that option, the default
value will be 1024.
MySQL replication capabilities are implemented using three threads
(one on the master server and two on the slave). When a
START SLAVE
is issued, the slave creates an I/O
thread, which connects to the master and asks it to send the
statements recorded in its binary logs. The master creates a
thread to send the binary log contents to the slave. This thread
can be identified as the Binlog Dump
thread in
the output of SHOW PROCESSLIST
on the master.
The slave I/O thread reads what the master Binlog
Dump
thread sends and copies this data to local files,
known as relay logs, in the slave's data
directory. The third thread is the SQL thread, which the slave
creates in order to read the relay logs and to execute the updates
they contain.
In the preceding description, there are three threads per slave. A master that has multiple slaves creates one thread for each slave that is currently connected slave; each slave has its own I/O and SQL threads.
Reading of statements and executing them are thus separated into two independent tasks. The task of reading statements is not slowed down if statement execution is slow. For example, if the slave server has not been running for a while, its I/O thread can quickly fetch all the binary log contents from the master when the slave starts, even if the SQL thread lags far behind. If the slave stops before the SQL thread has executed all the fetched statements, the I/O thread has at least fetched everything so that a safe copy of the statements is stored locally in the slave's relay logs, ready for execution the next time that the slave starts. This allows the binary logs to be purged on the master, because it no longer needs to wait for the slave to fetch their contents.
The SHOW PROCESSLIST
statement provides
information that tells you what is happening on the master and on
the slave regarding replication.
The following example illustrates how the three threads show up in
SHOW PROCESSLIST
.
On the master server, the output from SHOW
PROCESSLIST
looks like this:
mysql> SHOW PROCESSLIST\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Id: 2
User: root
Host: localhost:32931
db: NULL
Command: Binlog Dump
Time: 94
State: Has sent all binlog to slave; waiting for binlog to
be updated
Info: NULL
Here, thread 2 is a replication thread for a connected slave. The information indicates that all outstanding updates have been sent to the slave and that the master is waiting for more updates to occur.
On the slave server, the output from SHOW
PROCESSLIST
looks like this:
mysql> SHOW PROCESSLIST\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Id: 10
User: system user
Host:
db: NULL
Command: Connect
Time: 11
State: Waiting for master to send event
Info: NULL
*************************** 2. row ***************************
Id: 11
User: system user
Host:
db: NULL
Command: Connect
Time: 11
State: Has read all relay log; waiting for the slave I/O
thread to update it
Info: NULL
This information indicates that thread 10 is the I/O thread that
is communicating with the master server, and thread 11 is the SQL
thread that is processing the updates stored in the relay logs. At
the time that the SHOW PROCESSLIST
was run,
both threads were idle, waiting for further updates.
Note that the value in the Time
column can show
how late the slave is compared to the master. See
Section 6.11, “Replication FAQ”.
The following list shows the most common states you may see in
the State
column for the master's
Binlog Dump
thread. If you don't see any
Binlog Dump
threads on a master server, this
means that replication is not running — that is, that no
slaves are currently connected.
Sending binlog event to slave
Binary logs consist of events, where an event is usually an update plus some other information. The thread has read an event from the binary log and is now sending it to the slave.
Finished reading one binlog; switching to next
binlog
The thread has finished reading a binary log file and is opening the next one to send to the slave.
Has sent all binlog to slave; waiting for binlog to
be updated
The thread has read all outstanding updates from the binary logs and sent them to the slave. The thread is now idle, waiting for new events to appear in the binary log resulting from new updates occurring on the master.
Waiting to finalize termination
A very brief state that occurs as the thread is stopping.
The following list shows the most common states you see in the
State
column for a slave server I/O thread.
This state also appears in the Slave_IO_State
column displayed by SHOW SLAVE STATUS
. This
means that you can get a good view of what is happening merely
by using this statement.
Connecting to master
The thread is attempting to connect to the master.
Checking master version
A state that occurs very briefly, immediately after the connection to the master is established.
Registering slave on master
A state that occurs very briefly immediately after the connection to the master is established.
Requesting binlog dump
A state that occurs very briefly, immediately after the connection to the master is established. The thread sends to the master a request for the contents of its binary logs, starting from the requested binary log filename and position.
Waiting to reconnect after a failed binlog dump
request
If the binary log dump request failed (due to
disconnection), the thread goes into this state while it
sleeps, then tries to reconnect periodically. The interval
between retries can be specified using the
--master-connect-retry
option.
Reconnecting after a failed binlog dump
request
The thread is trying to reconnect to the master.
Waiting for master to send event
The thread has connected to the master and is waiting for
binary log events to arrive. This can last for a long time
if the master is idle. If the wait lasts for
slave_read_timeout
seconds, a timeout
occurs. At that point, the thread considers the connection
to be broken and make an attempt to reconnect.
Queueing master event to the relay log
The thread has read an event and is copying it to the relay log so that the SQL thread can process it.
Waiting to reconnect after a failed master event
read
An error occurred while reading (due to disconnection). The
thread is sleeping for
master-connect-retry
seconds before
attempting to reconnect.
Reconnecting after a failed master event
read
The thread is trying to reconnect to the master. When
connection is established again, the state becomes
Waiting for master to send event
.
Waiting for the slave SQL thread to free enough
relay log space
You are using a non-zero
relay_log_space_limit
value, and the
relay logs have grown until their combined size exceeds this
value. The I/O thread is waiting until the SQL thread frees
enough space by processing relay log contents so that it can
delete some relay log files.
Waiting for slave mutex on exit
A state that occurs briefly as the thread is stopping.
The following list shows the most common states you may see in
the State
column for a slave server SQL
thread:
Reading event from the relay log
The thread has read an event from the relay log so that the event can be processed.
Has read all relay log; waiting for the slave I/O
thread to update it
The thread has processed all events in the relay log files, and is now waiting for the I/O thread to write new events to the relay log.
Waiting for slave mutex on exit
A very brief state that occurs as the thread is stopping.
The State
column for the I/O thread may also
show the text of a statement. This indicates that the thread has
read an event from the relay log, extracted the statement from
it, and is executing it.
By default, relay logs are named using filenames of the form
,
where host_name
-relay-bin.nnnnnn
host_name
is the name of the
slave server host and nnnnnn
is a
sequence number. Successive relay log files are created using
successive sequence numbers, beginning with
000001
. The slave tracks relay logs currently
in use in an index file. The default relay log index filename is
.
By default, these files are created in the slave's data
directory. The default filenames may be overridden with the
host_name
-relay-bin.index--relay-log
and
--relay-log-index
server options. See
Section 6.9, “Replication Startup Options”.
Relay logs have the same format as binary logs, and can be read
using mysqlbinlog. A relay log is
automatically deleted by the SQL thread as soon as it has
executed all its events and no longer needs it. There is no
explicit mechanism for deleting relay logs because the SQL
thread takes care of doing so. However, FLUSH
LOGS
rotates relay logs, which influences when the SQL
thread deletes them.
A new relay log is created under the following conditions:
A new relay log is created each time the I/O thread starts.
When the logs are flushed; for example, with FLUSH
LOGS
or mysqladmin flush-logs.
When the size of the current relay log file becomes too large. The meaning of “too large” is determined as follows:
max_relay_log_size
, if
max_relay_log_size
> 0
max_binlog_size
, if
max_relay_log_size
= 0
A slave replication server creates two additional small files in
the data directory. These status files are
named master.info
and
relay-log.info
by default. They contain
information like that shown in the output of the SHOW
SLAVE STATUS
statement (see
Section 13.6.2, “SQL Statements for Controlling Slave Servers”, for a description of
this statement). As disk files, they survive a slave server's
shutdown. The next time the slave starts up, it reads these
files to determine how far it has proceeded in reading binary
logs from the master and in processing its own relay logs.
The master.info
file is updated by the I/O
thread. The correspondence between the lines in the file and the
columns displayed by SHOW SLAVE STATUS
is as
follows:
Line | Description |
1 | Number of lines in the file |
2 | Master_Log_File |
3 | Read_Master_Log_Pos |
4 | Master_Host |
5 | Master_User |
6 | Password (not shown by SHOW SLAVE STATUS ) |
7 | Master_Port |
8 | Connect_Retry |
9 | Master_SSL_Allowed |
10 | Master_SSL_CA_File |
11 | Master_SSL_CA_Path |
12 | Master_SSL_Cert |
13 | Master_SSL_Cipher |
14 | Master_SSL_Key |
The relay-log.info
file is updated by the
SQL thread. The correspondence between the lines in the file and
the columns displayed by SHOW SLAVE STATUS
is
shown here:
Line | Description |
1 | Relay_Log_File |
2 | Relay_Log_Pos |
3 | Relay_Master_Log_File |
4 | Exec_Master_Log_Pos |
When you back up the slave's data, you should back up these two
small files as well, along with the relay log files. They are
needed to resume replication after you restore the slave's data.
If you lose the relay logs but still have the
relay-log.info
file, you can check it to
determine how far the SQL thread has executed in the master
binary logs. Then you can use CHANGE MASTER
TO
with the MASTER_LOG_FILE
and
MASTER_LOG_POS
options to tell the slave to
re-read the binary logs from that point. Of course, this
requires that the binary logs still exist on the master server.
If your slave is subject to replicating LOAD DATA
INFILE
statements, you should also back up any
SQL_LOAD-*
files that exist in the
directory that the slave uses for this purpose. The slave needs
these files to resume replication of any interrupted
LOAD DATA INFILE
operations. The directory
location is specified using the
--slave-load-tmpdir
option. Its default value,
if not specified, is the value of the tmpdir
variable.
Here is a brief description of how to set up complete replication of your current MySQL server. It assumes that you want to replicate all databases on the master and have not previously configured replication. You need to shut down your master server briefly to complete the steps outlined here.
This procedure is written in terms of setting up a single slave, but you can use it to set up multiple slaves.
Although this method is the most straightforward way to set up a slave, it is not the only one. For example, if you have a snapshot of the master's data, and the master has its server ID set and binary logging enabled, you can set up a slave without shutting down the master or even blocking updates to it. For more details, please see Section 6.11, “Replication FAQ”.
If you want to administer a MySQL replication setup, we suggest that you read this entire chapter through and try all statements mentioned in Section 13.6.1, “SQL Statements for Controlling Master Servers”, and Section 13.6.2, “SQL Statements for Controlling Slave Servers”. You should also familiarize yourself with replication startup options described in Section 6.9, “Replication Startup Options”.
Note: this procedure and some of
the replication SQL statements shown in later sections require the
SUPER
privilege.
Make sure that the versions of MySQL installed on the master and slave are compatible according to the table shown in Section 6.6, “Replication Compatibility Between MySQL Versions”. Ideally, you should use the most recent version of MySQL on both master and slave.
Please do not report bugs until you have verified that the problem is present in the latest MySQL release.
Set up an account on the master server that the slave server
can use to connect. This account must be given the
REPLICATION SLAVE
privilege. If the account
is used only for replication (which is recommended), you don't
need to grant any additional privileges. (For information
about setting up user accounts and privileges, see
Section 5.8, “MySQL User Account Management”.)
Suppose that your domain is mydomain.com
and you want to create an account with a username of
repl
such that slave servers can use the
account to access the master server from any host in your
domain using a password of slavepass
. To
create the account, this use GRANT
statement:
mysql>GRANT REPLICATION SLAVE ON *.*
->TO 'repl'@'%.mydomain.com' IDENTIFIED BY 'slavepass';
If you plan to use the LOAD TABLE FROM
MASTER
or LOAD DATA FROM MASTER
statements from the slave host, you need to grant this account
additional privileges:
Grant the account the SUPER
and
RELOAD
global privileges.
Grant the SELECT
privilege for all
tables that you want to load. Any master tables from which
the account cannot SELECT
are ignored
by LOAD DATA FROM MASTER
.
Flush all the tables and block write statements by executing a
FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK
statement:
mysql> FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;
For InnoDB
tables, note the following:
FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK
also blocks
COMMIT
operations. When you have acquired a
global read lock, you can start a filesystem snapshot of your
InnoDB
tables. Internally (inside the
InnoDB
storage engine) the snapshot won't
be consistent (because the InnoDB
caches
are not flushed), but this is not a cause for concern, because
InnoDB
resolves this at startup and
delivers a consistent result. This means that
InnoDB
can perform crash recovery when
started on this snapshot, without corruption. However, there
is no way to stop the MySQL server while insuring a consistent
snapshot of your InnoDB
tables.
Leave running the client from which you issue the
FLUSH TABLES
statement so that the read
lock remains in effect. (If you exit the client, the lock is
released.) Then take a snapshot of the data on your master
server.
The easiest way to create a snapshot is to use an archiving program to make a binary backup of the databases in your master's data directory. For example, use tar on Unix, or PowerArchiver, WinRAR, WinZip, or any similar software on Windows. To use tar to create an archive that includes all databases, change location into the master server's data directory, then execute this command:
shell> tar -cvf /tmp/mysql-snapshot.tar .
If you want the archive to include only a database called
this_db
, use this command instead:
shell> tar -cvf /tmp/mysql-snapshot.tar ./this_db
Then copy the archive file to the /tmp
directory on the slave server host. On that machine, change
location into the slave's data directory, and unpack the
archive file using this command:
shell> tar -xvf /tmp/mysql-snapshot.tar
You may not want to replicate the mysql
database if the slave server has a different set of user
accounts from those that exist on the master. In this case,
you should exclude it from the archive. You also need not
include any log files in the archive, or the
master.info
or
relay-log.info
files.
While the read lock placed by FLUSH TABLES WITH READ
LOCK
is in effect, read the value of the current
binary log name and offset on the master:
mysql > SHOW MASTER STATUS; +---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+ | File | Position | Binlog_Do_DB | Binlog_Ignore_DB | +---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+ | mysql-bin.003 | 73 | test | manual,mysql | +---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+
The File
column shows the name of the log,
while Position
shows the offset. In this
example, the binary log value is
mysql-bin.003
and the offset is 73. Record
the values. You need to use them later when you are setting up
the slave. They represent the replication coordinates at which
the slave should begin processing new updates from the master.
After you have taken the snapshot and recorded the log name and offset, you can re-enable write activity on the master:
mysql> UNLOCK TABLES;
If you are using InnoDB
tables, ideally you
should use the InnoDB
Hot
Backup tool, which takes a consistent snapshot
without acquiring any locks on the master server, and records
the log name and offset corresponding to the snapshot to be
later used on the slave. Hot Backup is an
additional non-free (commercial) tool that is not included in
the standard MySQL distribution. See the
InnoDB
Hot Backup home
page at http://www.innodb.com/manual.php for
detailed information.
Without the Hot Backup tool, the quickest
way to take a binary snapshot of InnoDB
tables is to shut down the master server and copy the
InnoDB
data files, log files, and table
format files (.frm
files). To record the
current log file name and offset, you should issue the
following statements before you shut down the server:
mysql>FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;
mysql>SHOW MASTER STATUS;
Then record the log name and the offset from the output of
SHOW MASTER STATUS
as was shown earlier.
After recording the log name and the offset, shut down the
server without unlocking the tables to
make sure that the server goes down with the snapshot
corresponding to the current log file and offset:
shell> mysqladmin -u root shutdown
An alternative that works for both MyISAM
and InnoDB
tables is to take an SQL dump of
the master instead of a binary copy as described in the
preceding discussion. For this, you can use mysqldump
--master-data on your master and later load the SQL
dump file into your slave. However, this is slower than doing
a binary copy.
If the master has been previously running without
--log-bin
enabled, the log name and position
values displayed by SHOW MASTER STATUS
or
mysqldump --master-data are empty. In that
case, the values that you need to use later when specifying
the slave's log file and position are the empty string
(''
) and 4
.
Make sure that the [mysqld]
section of the
my.cnf
file on the master host includes a
log-bin
option. The section should also
have a server-id=master_id
option, where
master_id
must be a positive integer value
from 1 to 232 – 1. For
example:
[mysqld] log-bin=mysql-bin server-id=1
If those options are not present, add them and restart the server.
Stop the server that is to be used as a slave server and add
the following to its my.cnf
file:
[mysqld] server-id=slave_id
The slave_id
value, like the
master_id
value, must be a positive integer
value from 1 to 232 – 1. In
addition, it is very important that the ID of the slave be
different from the ID of the master. For example:
[mysqld] server-id=2
If you are setting up multiple slaves, each one must have a
unique server-id
value that differs from
that of the master and from each of the other slaves. Think of
server-id
values as something similar to IP
addresses: These IDs uniquely identify each server instance in
the community of replication partners.
If you do not specify a server-id
value, it
is set to 1 if you have not defined
master-host
; otherwise it is set to 2. Note
that in the case of server-id
omission, a
master refuses connections from all slaves, and a slave
refuses to connect to a master. Thus, omitting
server-id
is good only for backup with a
binary log.
If you made a binary backup of the master server's data, copy it to the slave server's data directory before starting the slave. Make sure that the privileges on the files and directories are correct. The user that the server MySQL runs as must able to read and write the files, just as on the master.
If you made a backup using mysqldump, start the slave first (see next step).
Start the slave server. If it has been replicating previously,
start the slave server with the
--skip-slave-start
option so that it doesn't
immediately try to connect to its master. You also may want to
start the slave server with the
--log-warnings
option (enabled by default),
to get more messages in the error log about problems (for
example, network or connection problems). Aborted connections
are not logged to the error log unless the value is greater
than 1
.
If you made a backup of the master server's data using mysqldump, load the dump file into the slave server:
shell> mysql -u root -p < dump_file.sql
Execute the following statement on the slave, replacing the option values with the actual values relevant to your system:
mysql>CHANGE MASTER TO
->MASTER_HOST='master_host_name',
->MASTER_USER='replication_user_name',
->MASTER_PASSWORD='replication_password',
->MASTER_LOG_FILE='recorded_log_file_name',
->MASTER_LOG_POS=recorded_log_position;
The following table shows the maximum length for the string options:
MASTER_HOST | 60 |
MASTER_USER | 16 |
MASTER_PASSWORD | 32 |
MASTER_LOG_FILE | 255 |
Start the slave threads:
mysql> START SLAVE;
After you have performed this procedure, the slave should connect to the master and catch up on any updates that have occurred since the snapshot was taken.
If you have forgotten to set the server-id
value for the master, slaves are not able to connect to it.
If you have forgotten to set the server-id
value for the slave, you get the following error in the slave's
error log:
Warning: You should set server-id to a non-0 value if master_host is set; we will force server id to 2, but this MySQL server will not act as a slave.
You also find error messages in the slave's error log if it is not able to replicate for any other reason.
Once a slave is replicating, you can find in its data directory
one file named master.info
and another named
relay-log.info
. The slave uses these two
files to keep track of how much of the master's binary log it has
processed. Do not remove or edit these files
unless you know exactly what you are doing and fully understand
the implications. Even in that case, it is preferred that you use
the CHANGE MASTER TO
statement.
Note: The content of
master.info
overrides some of the options
specified on the command line or in my.cnf
.
See Section 6.9, “Replication Startup Options”, for more details.
Once you have a snapshot, you can use it to set up other slaves by following the slave portion of the procedure just described. You do not need to take another snapshot of the master; you can use the same one for each slave.
Note: For the greatest possible durability and consistency in a
replication setup using InnoDB
with
transactions you should use
innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=1
and
sync-binlog=1
in the master
my.cnf
file.
The binary log format as implemented in MySQL 5.1 is
considerably different than that used in previous versions,
especially with regard to handling of character sets,
LOAD DATA INFILE
, and time zones.
Note: You cannot replicate from a master that uses a newer binary log format to a slave that uses an older format (for example, from MySQL 5.0 to MySQL 4.1.) This has significant consequences for upgrading servers in a replication setup, as described in Section 6.7, “Upgrading a Replication Setup”.
We recommend using the most recent MySQL version available because replication capabilities are continually being improved. We also recommend using the same version for both the master and the slave. We recommend upgrading masters and slaves running alpha or beta versions to new (production) versions. In many cases, replication from a newer master to an older slave will fail. In general, slaves running MySQL 5.1.x can be used with older masters (even those running MySQL 3.23, 4.0, or 4.1), but not the reverse.
The preceding information pertains to replication compatibility at the protocol level. However, there can be other constraints, such as SQL-level compatibility issues. For example, a 5.1 master cannot replicate to a 5.0 slave if the replicated statements use SQL features available in 5.1 but not in 5.0. These and other issues are discussed in Section 6.8, “Replication Features and Known Problems”.
When you upgrade servers that participate in a replication setup, the procedure for upgrading depends on the current server versions and the version to which you are upgrading.
This section applies to upgrading replication from MySQL 3.23, 4.0, or 4.1 to 5.1. A 4.0 server should be 4.0.3 or newer.
When you upgrade a master to 5.1 from an earlier MySQL release series, you should first ensure that all the slaves of this master are using the same 5.1.x release. If this is not the case, you should first upgrade the slaves. To upgrade each slave, shut it down, upgrade it to the appropriate 5.1.x version, restart it, and restart replication. The 5.1 slave is able to read the old relay logs written prior to the upgrade and to execute the statements they contain. Relay logs created by the slave after the upgrade are in 5.1 format.
After the slaves have been upgraded, shut down the master, upgrade it to the same 5.1.x release as the slaves, and restart it. The 5.1 master is able to read the old binary logs written prior to the upgrade and to send them to the 5.1 slaves. The slaves recognize the old format and handle it properly. Binary logs created by the master following the upgrade are in 5.1 format. These too are recognized by the 5.1 slaves.
In other words, there are no measures to take when upgrading to 5.1, except that the slaves must be 5.1 before you can upgrade the master to 5.1. Note that downgrading from 5.1 to older versions does not work so simply: you must ensure that any 5.1 binary logs or relay logs have been fully processed, so that you can remove them before proceeding with the downgrade.
Note that downgrading a replication setup to a previous version cannot be done once you've switched from statement-based to row-based replication, and after the first row-based statement has been written to the binlog. See Section 6.3, “Row-Based Replication”.
In general, replication compatibility at the SQL level requires
that any features used be supported by both the master and the
slave servers. If you use a feature on a master server that is
available only as of a given version of MySQL, you cannot
replicate to a slave that is older than that version. Such
incompatibilities are likely to occur between series, so that, for
example, you cannot replicate from MySQL 5.1 to
5.0. However, these incompatibilities also can occur
for within-series replication. For example, the
SLEEP()
function is available in MySQL 5.0.12
and up. If you use this function on the master server, you cannot
replicate to a slave server that is older than MySQL 5.0.12.
If you are planning to use replication between 5.1 and a previous version of MySQL you should consult the edition of the MySQL Reference Manual corresponding to the earlier release series for information regarding the replication characteristics of that series.
The following list provides details about what is supported and
what is not. Additional InnoDB
-specific
information about replication is given in
Section 15.2.6.5, “InnoDB
and MySQL Replication”.
With MySQL's classic statement-based replication, there may be issues with replicating stored routines or triggers. You can avoid these issues by using MySQL's row-based replication (RBR) instead. For a detailed list of issues, see Section 20.4, “Binary Logging of Stored Routines and Triggers”. For a description of row-based replication, see Section 6.3, “Row-Based Replication”.
Replication is done correctly with
AUTO_INCREMENT
,
LAST_INSERT_ID()
, and
TIMESTAMP
values.
The USER()
, UUID()
, and
LOAD_FILE()
functions are replicated
without changes and thus do not work reliably on the slave.
The following restriction applies to statement-based
replication only, not to row-based replication. The
functions handling user-level locks:
GET_LOCK()
,
RELEASE_LOCK()
,
IS_FREE_LOCK()
,
IS_USED_LOCK()
are replicated without the
slave knowing the concurrency context on master; so these
functions should not be used to insert into a master's table
as the content on slave would differ (i.e. do not do
INSERT INTO mytable VALUES(GET_LOCK(...))
).
The FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS
,
SQL_MODE
, UNIQUE_CHECKS
,
and SQL_AUTO_IS_NULL
variables are all
replicated in MySQL 5.1. The
TABLE_TYPE
, also known as
STORAGE_ENGINE
variable is not yet
replicated, which is a good thing for replication between
different storage engines.
Replication works even if the master and slave have different global character set variables, and even if the master and slave have different global timezone variables.
The following applies to replication between MySQL servers using different character sets:
You must always use the
same global character set
and collation (--default-character-set
,
--default-collation
) on the master and
the slave. Otherwise, you may get duplicate-key errors on
the slave, because a key that is regarded as unique in the
master's character set may not be unique in the slave's
character set.
If the master is older than MySQL 4.1.3, then the
character set of the session should never be made
different from its global value (in other words, do not
use SET NAMES
, SET CHARACTER
SET
, and so on) because this character set
change is not known to the slave. If both the master and
the slave are 4.1.3 or newer, the session can freely set
local values for character set variables (such as
NAMES
, CHARACTER
SET
, COLLATION_CLIENT
, and
COLLATION_SERVER
) as these settings are
written to the binary log and so known to the slave.
However, the session is prevented from changing the
global value of these; as
stated previously, the master and slave must always have
identical global character set values.
If on the master you have databases with different
character sets from the global
collation_server
value, you should
design your CREATE TABLE
statements so
that they do not implicitly rely on the databases' default
character sets (Bug #2326); a good workaround is to state
the character set and collation explicitly in
CREATE TABLE
.
For both master and slave the same system time zone should be
set. Otherwise some statements, for example statements using
NOW()
or FROM_UNIXTIME()
functions, won't be replicated properly. One could set the
time zone in which MySQL server runs by using the
--timezone=
option of the timezone_name
mysqld_safe
script or by
setting the TZ
environment variable. Both
master and slave should also have the same default connection
time zone setting; that is, the
--default-time-zone
parameter should have the
same value for both master and slave.
CONVERT_TZ(...,...,@global.time_zone)
is
not properly replicated.
CONVERT_TZ(...,...,@session.time_zone)
is
properly replicated only if master and slave are 5.0.4 or
newer.
Session variables are not replicated properly when used in
statements which update tables; for example: SET
MAX_JOIN_SIZE=1000; INSERT INTO mytable
VALUES(@MAX_JOIN_SIZE);
will not insert the same
data on master and on slave. This does not apply to the common
SET TIME_ZONE=...; INSERT INTO mytable
VALUES(CONVERT_TZ(...,...,@time_zone))
.
It is possible to replicate transactional tables on the master
using non-transactional tables on the slave. For example, you
can replicate an InnoDB
master table as a
MyISAM
slave table. However, if you do
this, there are problems if the slave is stopped in the middle
of a BEGIN
/COMMIT
block,
because the slave restarts at the beginning of the
BEGIN
block. This issue is on our TODO and
will be fixed in the near future.
Update statements that refer to user variables (that is,
variables of the form
@
) are
replicated correctly in MySQL 5.1; however this
is not true for versions prior to 4.1. Note that user variable
names are case insensitive starting in MySQL 5.1;
you should take this into account when setting up replication
between 5.1 and older versions.
var_name
Slaves can connect to masters using SSL.
There is a global system variable
slave_transaction_retries
: If the
replication slave SQL thread fails to execute a transaction
because of an InnoDB
deadlock or exceeded
InnoDB
's
innodb_lock_wait_timeout
or NDBCluster's
TransactionDeadlockDetectionTimeout
or
TransactionInactiveTimeout
, it
automatically retries
slave_transaction_retries
times before
stopping with an error. The default value is 10. Starting from
MySQL 5.0.4, the total count of retries can be seen in the
output of SHOW STATUS
; see
Section 5.3.4, “Server Status Variables”.
If a DATA DIRECTORY
or INDEX
DIRECTORY
clause is used in a CREATE
TABLE
statement on the master server, the clause is
also used on the slave. This can cause problems if no
corresponding directory exists in the slave host filesystem or
exists but is not accessible to the slave server. MySQL
5.1 supports an sql_mode
option called NO_DIR_IN_CREATE
. If the
slave server is run with its SQL mode set to include this
option, it ignores these clauses in replicating the
CREATE TABLE
statement. The result is that
MyISAM
data and index files are created in
the table's database directory.
The following restriction applies to statement-based replication only, not to row-based replication: It is possible for the data on the master and slave to become different if a query is designed in such a way that the data modification is non-deterministic; that is, left to the will of the query optimizer. (This is in general not a good practice, even outside of replication.) For a detailed explanation of this issue, see Section A.8.1, “Open Issues in MySQL”.
FLUSH LOGS
, FLUSH
MASTER
, FLUSH SLAVE
, and
FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK
are not logged,
as any of these could cause problems if replicated to a
slave.) For a syntax example, see Section 13.5.5.2, “FLUSH
Syntax”.
FLUSH TABLES
, ANALYZE
TABLE
, OPTIMIZE TABLE
, and
REPAIR TABLE
statements are written to the
binary log and thus replicated to slaves. This is not normally
a problem because these statements do not modify table data.
However, this can cause difficulties under certain
circumstances. If you replicate the privilege tables in the
mysql
database and update those tables
directly without using GRANT
, you must
issue a FLUSH PRIVILEGES
on the slaves to
put the new privileges into effect. In addition, if you use
FLUSH TABLES
when renaming a
MyISAM
table that is part of a
MERGE
table, you must issue FLUSH
TABLES
manually on the slaves. These statements are
written to the binary log unless you specify
NO_WRITE_TO_BINLOG
or its alias
LOCAL
.
MySQL only supports one master and many slaves. In the future
we plan to add a voting algorithm for changing the master
automatically in the event of problems with the current
master. We also plan to introduce agent processes to help
perform load balancing by sending SELECT
queries to different slaves.
When a server shuts down and restarts, its
MEMORY
tables become empty. The master
replicates this effect as follows: The first time that the
master uses each MEMORY
table after
startup, it notifies the slaves that the table needs to be
emptied by writing a DELETE FROM
statement
for that table to the binary log. See
Section 15.4, “The MEMORY
(HEAP
) Storage Engine”, for more information.
Temporary tables are replicated except in the case where you shut down the slave server (not just the slave threads) and you have replicated temporary tables that are used in updates that have not yet been executed on the slave. If you shut down the slave server, the temporary tables needed by those updates are no longer available when the slave is restarted. To avoid this problem, do not shut down the slave while it has temporary tables open. Instead, use the following procedure:
Issue a STOP SLAVE
statement.
Use SHOW STATUS
to check the value of
the Slave_open_temp_tables
variable.
If the value is 0, issue a mysqladmin shutdown command to shut down the slave.
If the value is not 0, restart the slave threads with
START SLAVE
.
Repeat the procedure later to see whether you have better luck next time.
We plan to fix this problem in the near future.
It is safe to connect servers in a circular master/slave
relationship with the --log-slave-updates
option specified. Note, however, that many statements do not
work correctly in this kind of setup unless your client code
is written to take care of the potential problems that can
occur from updates that occur in different sequence on
different servers.
This means that you can create a setup such as this:
A -> B -> C -> A
Server IDs are encoded in binary log events, so server A knows
when an event that it reads was originally created by itself
and does not execute the event (unless server A was started
with the --replicate-same-server-id
option,
which is meaningful only in rare cases). Thus, there are no
infinite loops. This type of circular setup works only if you
perform no conflicting updates between the tables. In other
words, if you insert data in both A and C, you should never
insert a row in A that may have a key that conflicts with a
row inserted in C. You should also not update the same rows on
two servers if the order in which the updates are applied is
significant.
If a statement on the slave produces an error, the slave SQL
thread terminates, and the slave writes a message to its error
log. You should then connect to the slave manually, fix the
problem (for example, a non-existent table), and then run
START SLAVE
.
It is safe to shut down a master server and restart it later.
If a slave loses its connection to the master, the slave tries
to reconnect immediately. If that fails, the slave retries
periodically. (The default is to retry every 60 seconds. This
may be changed with the
--master-connect-retry
option.) The slave
also is able to deal with network connectivity outages.
However, the slave does notice the network outage only after
receiving no data from the master for
slave_net_timeout
seconds. If your outages
are short, you may want to decrease
slave_net_timeout
. See
Section 5.3.3, “Server System Variables”.
Shutting down the slave (cleanly) is also safe, as it keeps
track of where it left off. Unclean shutdowns might produce
problems, especially if disk cache was not flushed to disk
before the system went down. Your system fault tolerance is
greatly increased if you have a good uninterruptible power
supply. Unclean shutdowns of the master may cause
inconsistencies between the content of tables and the binary
log in master; this can be avoided by using
InnoDB
tables and the
--innodb-safe-binlog
option on the master.
See Section 5.11.3, “The Binary Log”.
(Note:
--innodb-safe-binlog
is not needed in MySQL
5.1, having been made obsolete by the
introduction of XA transaction support.)
Due to the non-transactional nature of
MyISAM
tables, it is possible to have a
statement that only partially updates a table and returns an
error code. This can happen, for example, on a multiple-row
insert that has one row violating a key constraint, or if a
long update statement is killed after updating some of the
rows. If that happens on the master, the slave thread exits
and waits for the database administrator to decide what to do
about it unless the error code is legitimate and the statement
execution results in the same error code. If this error code
validation behavior is not desirable, some or all errors can
be masked out (ignored) with the
--slave-skip-errors
option.
If you update transactional tables from non-transactional
tables inside a
BEGIN
/COMMIT
sequence,
updates to the binary log may be out of sync if the
non-transactional table is updated before the transaction
commits. This is because the transaction is written to the
binary log only when it is committed.
In situations where transactions mix updates to transactional
and non-transactional, the order of statements in the binary
log is correct, and all needed statements are written to the
binary log even in case of a ROLLBACK
).
However, when a second connection updates the
non-transactional table before the first connection's
transaction is complete, statements can be logged out of
order, because the second connection's update is written
immediately after it is performed, regardless of the state of
the transaction being performed by the first connection.
On both the master and the slave, you must use the
server-id
option to establish a unique
replication ID for each server. You should pick a unique positive
integer in the range from 1 to 232
– 1 for each master and slave. Example:
server-id=3
The options that you can use on the master server for controlling binary logging are described in Section 5.11.3, “The Binary Log”.
The following table describes the options you can use on MySQL 5.1 slave replication servers. You can specify these options either on the command line or in an option file.
Some slave server replication options are handled in a special
way, in the sense that they are ignored if a
master.info
file exists when the slave starts
and contains values for the options. The following options are
handled this way:
--master-host
--master-user
--master-password
--master-port
--master-connect-retry
--master-ssl
--master-ssl-ca
--master-ssl-capath
--master-ssl-cert
--master-ssl-cipher
--master-ssl-key
The master.info
file format in
5.1 includes values corresponding to the SSL options.
In addition, the file format includes as its first line the number
of lines in the file. If you upgrade an older server to a newer
version, the new server upgrades the
master.info
file to the new format
automatically when it starts. However, if you downgrade a newer
server to an older version, you should remove the first line
manually before starting the older server for the first time.
If no master.info
file exists when the slave
server starts, it uses the values for those options that are
specified in option files or on the command line. This occurs when
you start the server as a replication slave for the very first
time, or when you have run RESET SLAVE
and then
have shut down and restarted the slave.
If the master.info
file exists when the slave
server starts, the server ignores those options. Instead, it uses
the values found in the master.info
file.
If you restart the slave server with different values of the
startup options that correspond to values in the
master.info
file, the different values have
no effect, because the server continues to use the
master.info
file. To use different values,
you must either restart after removing the
master.info
file or (preferably) use the
CHANGE MASTER TO
statement to reset the values
while the slave is running.
Suppose that you specify this option in your
my.cnf
file:
[mysqld] master-host=some_host
The first time you start the server as a replication slave, it
reads and uses that option from the my.cnf
file. The server then records the value in the
master.info
file. The next time you start the
server, it reads the master host value from the
master.info
file only and ignores the value
in the option file. If you modify the my.cnf
file to specify a different master host of
some_other_host
, the change still has no
effect. You should use CHANGE MASTER TO
instead.
Because the server gives an existing
master.info
file precedence over the startup
options just described, you might prefer not to use startup
options for these values at all, and instead specify them by using
the CHANGE MASTER TO
statement. See
Section 13.6.2.1, “CHANGE MASTER TO
Syntax”.
This example shows a more extensive use of startup options to configure a slave server:
[mysqld] server-id=2 master-host=db-master.mycompany.com master-port=3306 master-user=pertinax master-password=freitag master-connect-retry=60 report-host=db-slave.mycompany.com
The following list describes startup options for controlling
replication: Many of these options can be reset while the server
is running by using the CHANGE MASTER TO
statement. Others, such as the --replicate-*
options, can be set only when the slave server starts. We plan to
fix this.
--log-slave-updates
Normally, updates received from a master server by a slave are
not logged to its binary log. This option tells the slave to
log the updates performed by its SQL thread to the slave's own
binary log. For this option to have any effect, the slave must
also be started with the --log-bin
option to
enable binary logging. --log-slave-updates
is
used when you want to chain replication servers. For example,
you might want a setup like this:
A -> B -> C
That is, A serves as the master for the slave B, and B serves
as the master for the slave C. For this to work, B must be
both a master and a slave. You must start
both A and B with --log-bin
to enable binary
logging, and B with the --log-slave-updates
option.
--log-warnings
Makes the slave print more messages to the error log about
what it is doing. For example, it warns you that it succeeded
in reconnecting after a network/connection failure, and
informs you as to how each slave thread started. This option
is enabled by default; to disable it, use
--skip-log-warnings
. Aborted connections are
not logged to the error log unless the value is greater than
1
.
Note that the effects of this option are not limited to replication. It produces warnings across a spectrum of server activities.
--master-connect-retry=
seconds
The number of seconds the slave thread sleeps before retrying
to connect to the master in case the master goes down or the
connection is lost. The value in the
master.info
file takes precedence if it
can be read. If not set, the default is 60.
--master-host=
host
The hostname or IP number of the master replication server. If
this option is not given, the slave thread does not start. The
value in master.info
takes precedence if
it can be read.
--master-info-file=
file_name
The name to use for the file in which the slave records
information about the master. The default name is
mysql.info
in the data directory.
--master-password=
password
The password of the account that the slave thread uses for
authentication when connecting to the master. The value in the
master.info
file takes precedence if it
can be read. If not set, an empty password is assumed.
--master-port=
port_number
The TCP/IP port the master is listening on. The value in the
master.info
file takes precedence if it
can be read. If not set, the compiled-in setting is assumed.
If you have not tinkered with configure
options, this should be 3306.
--master-retry-count=
count
The number of times the slave tries to connect to the master before giving up.
--master-ssl
,
--master-ssl-ca=
,
file_name
--master-ssl-capath=
,
directory_name
--master-ssl-cert=
,
file_name
--master-ssl-cipher=
,
cipher_list
--master-ssl-key=
file_name
These options are used for setting up a secure replication
connection to the master server using SSL. Their meanings are
the same as the corresponding --ssl
,
--ssl-ca
, --ssl-capath
,
--ssl-cert
, --ssl-cipher
,
--ssl-key
options described in
Section 5.8.7.6, “SSL Command-Line Options”. The values in the
master.info
file take precedence if they
can be read.
--master-user=
username
The username of the account that the slave thread uses for
authentication when connecting to the master. This account
must have the REPLICATION SLAVE
privilege.
The value in the master.info
file, if it
can be read, takes precedence. If the master user is not set,
user test
is assumed.
--max-relay-log-size=
size
To rotate the relay log automatically. See Section 5.3.3, “Server System Variables”.
--read-only
This option causes the slave not to allow any updates except
from slave threads or from users having the
SUPER
privilege. This can be useful to
ensure that a slave server accepts no updates from clients.
This option does not apply to TEMPORARY
tables.
--relay-log=
file_name
The name for the relay log. The default name is
,
where host_name
-relay-bin.nnnnnn
host_name
is the name of the
slave server host and nnnnnn
indicates that relay logs are created in numbered sequence.
You can specify the option to create hostname-independent
relay log names, or if your relay logs tend to be big (and you
don't want to decrease max_relay_log_size
)
and you need to put them in some area different from the data
directory, or if you want to increase speed by balancing load
between disks.
--relay-log-index=
file_name
The location and name that should be used for the relay log
index file. The default name is
,
where host_name
-relay-bin.indexhost_name
is the name of the
slave server.
--relay-log-info-file=
file_name
The name to use for the file in which the slave records
information about the relay logs. The default name is
relay-log.info
in the data directory.
--relay-log-purge={0|1}
Disables or enables automatic purging of relay logs as soon as
they are not needed any more. The default value is 1
(enabled). This is a global variable that can be changed
dynamically with SET GLOBAL
relay_log_purge
.
--relay-log-space-limit=
size
Places an upper limit on the total size of all relay logs on
the slave (a value of 0 means “unlimited”). This
is useful for a slave server host that has limited disk space.
When the limit is reached, the I/O thread stops reading binary
log events from the master server until the SQL thread has
caught up and deleted some unused relay logs. Note that this
limit is not absolute: There are cases where the SQL thread
needs more events before it can delete relay logs. In that
case, the I/O thread exceeds the limit until it becomes
possible for the SQL thread to delete some relay logs. (Not
doing so would cause a deadlock.) You should not set
--relay-log-space-limit
to less than twice
the value of --max-relay-log-size
(or
--max-binlog-size
if
--max-relay-log-size
is 0). In that case,
there is a chance that the I/O thread waits for free space
because --relay-log-space-limit
is exceeded,
but the SQL thread has no relay log to purge and is unable to
satisfy the I/O thread. This forces the I/O thread to
temporarily ignore --relay-log-space-limit
.
--replicate-do-db=
db_name
Tells the slave to restrict replication to statements where
the default database (that is, the one selected by
USE
) is db_name
.
To specify more than one database, use this option multiple
times, once for each database. Note that this does not
replicate cross-database statements such as UPDATE
while having selected a different database
or no database. If you need cross-database updates to work,
use
some_db.some_table
SET
foo='bar'--replicate-wild-do-table=
.
See Section 6.10, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Rules”.
db_name
.%
An example of what does not work as you might expect: If the
slave is started with --replicate-do-db=sales
and you issue the following statements on the master, the
UPDATE
statement is
not replicated:
USE prices; UPDATE sales.january SET amount=amount+1000;
If you need cross-database updates to work, use
--replicate-wild-do-table=
instead.
db_name
.%
The main reason for this “just check the default
database” behavior is that it is difficult from the
statement alone to know whether or not it should be replicated
(for example, if you are using multiple-table
DELETE
statements or multiple-table
UPDATE
statements that act across multiple
databases). It is also faster to check only the default
database rather than all databases if there is no need.
--replicate-do-table=
db_name.tbl_name
Tells the slave thread to restrict replication to the
specified table. To specify more than one table, use this
option multiple times, once for each table. This works for
cross-database updates, in contrast to
--replicate-do-db
. See
Section 6.10, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Rules”.
--replicate-ignore-db=
db_name
Tells the slave to not replicate any statement where the
default database (that is, the one selected by
USE
) is db_name
.
To specify more than one database to ignore, use this option
multiple times, once for each database. You should not use
this option if you are using cross-database updates and you do
not want these updates to be replicated. See
Section 6.10, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Rules”.
An example of what does not work as you might expect: If the
slave is started with
--replicate-ignore-db=sales
and you issue the
following statements on the master, the
UPDATE
statement is
not replicated:
USE prices; UPDATE sales.january SET amount=amount+1000;
If you need cross-database updates to work, use
--replicate-wild-ignore-table=
instead.
db_name
.%
--replicate-ignore-table=
db_name.tbl_name
Tells the slave thread to not replicate any statement that
updates the specified table (even if any other tables might be
updated by the same statement). To specify more than one table
to ignore, use this option multiple times, once for each
table. This works for cross-database updates, in contrast to
--replicate-ignore-db
. See
Section 6.10, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Rules”.
--replicate-wild-do-table=
db_name.tbl_name
Tells the slave thread to restrict replication to statements
where any of the updated tables match the specified database
and table name patterns. Patterns can contain the
‘%
’ and
‘_
’ wildcard characters, which
have the same meaning as for the LIKE
pattern-matching operator. To specify more than one table, use
this option multiple times, once for each table. This works
for cross-database updates. See
Section 6.10, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Rules”.
Example: --replicate-wild-do-table=foo%.bar%
replicates only updates that use a table where the database
name starts with foo
and the table name
starts with bar
.
If the table name pattern is %
, it matches
any table name and the option also applies to database-level
statements (CREATE DATABASE
, DROP
DATABASE
, and ALTER DATABASE
).
For example, if you use
--replicate-wild-do-table=foo%.%
,
database-level statements are replicated if the database name
matches the pattern foo%
.
To include literal wildcard characters in the database or
table name patterns, escape them with a backslash. For
example, to replicate all tables of a database that is named
my_own%db
, but not replicate tables from
the my1ownAABCdb
database, you should
escape the ‘_
’ and
‘%
’ characters like this:
--replicate-wild-do-table=my\_own\%db
. If
you're using the option on the command line, you might need to
double the backslashes or quote the option value, depending on
your command interpreter. For example, with the
bash shell, you would need to type
--replicate-wild-do-table=my\\_own\\%db
.
--replicate-wild-ignore-table=
db_name.tbl_name
Tells the slave thread to not replicate a statement where any table matches the given wildcard pattern. To specify more than one table to ignore, use this option multiple times, once for each table. This works for cross-database updates. See Section 6.10, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Rules”.
Example:
--replicate-wild-ignore-table=foo%.bar%
does
not replicate updates that use a table where the database name
starts with foo
and the table name starts
with bar
.
For information about how matching works, see the description
of the --replicate-wild-do-table
option. The
rules for including literal wildcard characters in the option
value are the same as for
--replicate-wild-ignore-table
as well.
--replicate-rewrite-db=
from_name
->to_name
Tells the slave to translate the default database (that is,
the one selected by USE
) to
to_name
if it was
from_name
on the master. Only
statements involving tables are affected (not statements such
as CREATE DATABASE
, DROP
DATABASE
, and ALTER DATABASE
),
and only if from_name
was the
default database on the master. This does not work for
cross-database updates. Note that the database name
translation is done before --replicate-*
rules are tested.
If you use this option on the command line and the
‘>
’ character is special to
your command interpreter, quote the option value. For example:
shell> mysqld --replicate-rewrite-db="olddb
->newdb
"
--replicate-same-server-id
To be used on slave servers. Usually you can should the
default setting of 0, to prevent infinite loops in circular
replication. If set to 1, this slave does not skip events
having its own server id; normally this is useful only in rare
configurations. Cannot be set to 1 if
--log-slave-updates
is used. Note that by
default the slave I/O thread does not even write binary log
events to the relay log if they have the slave's server id
(this optimization helps save disk usage). So if you want to
use --replicate-same-server-id
, be sure to
start the slave with this option before you make the slave
read its own events which you want the slave SQL thread to
execute.
--report-host=
slave_name
The hostname or IP number of the slave to be reported to the
master during slave registration. This value appears in the
output of SHOW SLAVE HOSTS
on the master
server. Leave the value unset if you do not want the slave to
register itself with the master. Note that it is not
sufficient for the master to simply read the IP number of the
slave from the TCP/IP socket after the slave connects. Due to
NAT
and other routing issues, that IP may
not be valid for connecting to the slave from the master or
other hosts.
--report-port=
slave_port
The TCP/IP port number for connecting to the slave, to be reported to the master during slave registration. Set it only if the slave is listening on a non-default port or if you have a special tunnel from the master or other clients to the slave. If you are not sure, leave this option unset.
--skip-slave-start
Tells the slave server not to start the slave threads when the
server starts. To start the threads later, use a
START SLAVE
statement.
--slave_compressed_protocol={0|1}
If this option is set to 1, use compression for the slave/master protocol if both the slave and the master support it.
--slave-load-tmpdir=
file_name
The name of the directory where the slave creates temporary
files. This option is by default equal to the value of the
tmpdir
system variable. When the slave SQL
thread replicates a LOAD DATA INFILE
statement, it extracts the to-be-loaded file from the relay
log into temporary files, then loads these into the table. If
the file loaded on the master was huge, the temporary files on
the slave are huge, too. Therefore, it might be advisable to
use this option to tell the slave to put temporary files in a
directory located in some filesystem that has a lot of
available space. In that case, you may also use the
--relay-log
option to place the relay logs in
that filesystem, because the relay logs are huge as well.
--slave-load-tmpdir
should point to a
disk-based filesystem, not a memory-based one: The slave needs
the temporary files used to replicate LOAD DATA
INFILE
to survive a machine's restart. The directory
also should not be one that is cleared by the operating system
during the system startup process.
--slave-net-timeout=
seconds
The number of seconds to wait for more data from the master
before aborting the read, considering the connection broken,
and trying to reconnect. The first retry occurs immediately
after the timeout. The interval between retries is controlled
by the --master-connect-retry
option.
--slave-skip-errors=[
err_code1
,err_code2
,...
| all]
Normally, replication stops when an error occurs, which gives you the opportunity to resolve the inconsistency in the data manually. This option tells the slave SQL thread to continue replication when a statement returns any of the errors listed in the option value.
Do not use this option unless you fully understand why you are getting errors. If there are no bugs in your replication setup and client programs, and no bugs in MySQL itself, an error that stops replication should never occur. Indiscriminate use of this option results in slaves becoming hopelessly out of sync with the master, with you having no idea why this has occurred.
For error codes, you should use the numbers provided by the
error message in your slave error log and in the output of
SHOW SLAVE STATUS
. The server error codes
are listed in Appendix B, Error Codes and Messages.
You can also (but should not) use the very non-recommended
value of all
which ignores all error
messages and keeps going regardless of what happens. Needless
to say, if you use it, we make no guarantees regarding
integrity the integrity of your data. Please do not complain
(or file bug reports) in this case if the slave's data is not
anywhere close to what it is on the master. You have
been warned.
Examples:
--slave-skip-errors=1062,1053 --slave-skip-errors=all
The slave server evaluates the --replicate-*
rules as follows to determine whether to execute or ignore a
statement:
Are there any --replicate-do-db
or
--replicate-ignore-db
rules?
Yes: Test them as for
--binlog-do-db
and
--binlog-ignore-db
(see
Section 5.11.3, “The Binary Log”). What is the result of the
test?
Ignore the statement: Ignore it and exit.
Permit the statement: Do not execute the statement immediately. Defer the decision; proceed to the next step.
No: Proceed to the next step.
Are we currently executing a stored function?
Yes: Execute the query and exit.
No: Proceed to the next step.
Are there any --replicate-*-table
rules?
No: Execute the query and exit.
Yes: Proceed to the next step and
begin evaluating the table rules in the order shown (first
the non-wild rules, and then the wild rules). Only tables
that are to be updated are compared to the rules
(INSERT INTO sales SELECT * FROM
prices
: only sales
is
compared to the rules). If several tables are to be
updated (multiple-table statement), the first matching
table (matching “do” or
“ignore”) wins. That is, the first table is
compared to the rules. Then, if no decision could be made,
the second table is compared to the rules, and so on.
Are there any --replicate-do-table
rules?
Yes: Does the table match any of them?
Yes: Execute the query and exit.
No: Proceed to the next step.
No: Proceed to the next step.
Are there any --replicate-ignore-table
rules?
Yes: Does the table match any of them?
Yes: Ignore the query and exit.
No: Proceed to the next step.
No: Proceed to the next step.
Are there any --replicate-wild-do-table
rules?
Yes: Does the table match any of them?
Yes: Execute the query and exit.
No: Proceed to the next step.
No: Proceed to the next step.
Are there any --replicate-wild-ignore-table
rules?
Yes: Does the table match any of them?
Yes: Ignore the query and exit.
No: Proceed to the next step.
No: Proceed to the next step.
No --replicate-*-table
rule was matched. Is
there another table to test against these rules?
Yes: Loop.
No: We have now tested all tables to
be updated and could not match any rule. Are there
--replicate-do-table
or
--replicate-wild-do-table
rules?
Yes: There were “do” rules but no match. Ignore the query and exit.
No: Execute the query and exit.
Q: How do I configure a slave if the master is running and I do not want to stop it?
A: There are several options. If
you have taken a backup of the master at some point and recorded
the binary log name and offset (from the output of SHOW
MASTER STATUS
) corresponding to the snapshot, use the
following procedure:
Make sure that the slave is assigned a unique server ID.
Execute the following statement on the slave, filling in appropriate values for each option:
mysql>CHANGE MASTER TO
->MASTER_HOST='master_host_name',
->MASTER_USER='master_user_name',
->MASTER_PASSWORD='master_pass',
->MASTER_LOG_FILE='recorded_log_file_name',
->MASTER_LOG_POS=recorded_log_position;
Execute START SLAVE
on the slave.
If you do not have a backup of the master server, here is a quick procedure for creating one. All steps should be performed on the master host.
Issue this statement:
mysql> FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;
With the lock still in place, execute this command (or a variation of it):
shell> tar zcf /tmp/backup.tar.gz /var/lib/mysql
Issue this statement and make sure to record the output, which you need later:
mysql> SHOW MASTER STATUS;
Release the lock:
mysql> UNLOCK TABLES;
An alternative is to make an SQL dump of the master instead of a binary copy as in the preceding procedure. To do this, you can use mysqldump --master-data on your master and later load the SQL dump into your slave. However, this is slower than making a binary copy.
No matter which of the two methods you use, afterward follow the instructions for the case when you have a snapshot and have recorded the log name and offset. You can use the same snapshot to set up several slaves. Once you have the snapshot of the master, you can wait to set up a slave as long as the binary logs of the master are left intact. The two practical limitations on the length of time you can wait are the amount of disk space available to retain binary logs on the master and the length of time it takes the slave to catch up.
You can also use LOAD DATA FROM MASTER
. This is
a convenient statement that transfers a snapshot to the slave and
adjusts the log name and offset all at once. In the future,
LOAD DATA FROM MASTER
will be the recommended
way to set up a slave. Be warned, however, that it works only for
MyISAM
tables and it may hold a read lock for a
long time. It is not yet implemented as efficiently as we would
like. If you have large tables, the preferred method at this time
is still to make a binary snapshot on the master server after
executing FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK
.
Q: Does the slave need to be connected to the master all the time?
A: No, it does not. The slave can go down or stay disconnected for hours or even days, then reconnect and catch up on updates. For example, you can set up a master/slave relationship over a dial-up link where the link is up only sporadically and for short periods of time. The implication of this is that, at any given time, the slave is not guaranteed to be in sync with the master unless you take some special measures. In the future, we will have the option to block the master until at least one slave is in sync.
Q: How do I know how late a slave is compared to the master? In other words, how do I know the date of the last query replicated by the slave?
A: You can read the
Seconds_Behind_Master
column in SHOW
SLAVE STATUS
. See
Section 6.4, “Replication Implementation Details”.
When the slave SQL thread executes an event read from the master,
it modifies its own time to the event timestamp (this is why
TIMESTAMP
is well replicated). In the
Time
column in the output of SHOW
PROCESSLIST
, the number of seconds displayed for the
slave SQL thread is the number of seconds between the timestamp of
the last replicated event and the real time of the slave machine.
You can use this to determine the date of the last replicated
event. Note that if your slave has been disconnected from the
master for one hour, and then reconnects, you may immediately see
Time
values like 3600 for the slave SQL thread
in SHOW PROCESSLIST
. This would be because the
slave is executing statements that are one hour old.
Q: How do I force the master to block updates until the slave catches up?
A: Use the following procedure:
On the master, execute these statements:
mysql>FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;
mysql>SHOW MASTER STATUS;
Record the log name and the offset from the output of the
SHOW
statement. These are the replication
coordinates.
On the slave, issue the following statement, where the
arguments to the MASTER_POS_WAIT()
function
are the replication coordinate values obtained in the previous
step:
mysql> SELECT MASTER_POS_WAIT('log_name', log_offset);
The SELECT
statement blocks until the slave
reaches the specified log file and offset. At that point, the
slave is in sync with the master and the statement returns.
On the master, issue the following statement to allow the master to begin processing updates again:
mysql> UNLOCK TABLES;
Q: What issues should I be aware of when setting up two-way replication?
A: MySQL replication currently does not support any locking protocol between master and slave to guarantee the atomicity of a distributed (cross-server) update. In other words, it is possible for client A to make an update to co-master 1, and in the meantime, before it propagates to co-master 2, client B could make an update to co-master 2 that makes the update of client A work differently than it did on co-master 1. Thus, when the update of client A makes it to co-master 2, it produces tables that are different than what you have on co-master 1, even after all the updates from co-master 2 have also propagated. This means that you should not chain two servers together in a two-way replication relationship unless you are sure that your updates can safely happen in any order, or unless you take care of mis-ordered updates somehow in the client code.
You must also realize that two-way replication actually does not improve performance very much (if at all), as far as updates are concerned. Both servers need to do the same number of updates each, as you would have one server do. The only difference is that there is a little less lock contention, because the updates originating on another server are serialized in one slave thread. Even this benefit might be offset by network delays.
Q: How can I use replication to improve performance of my system?
A: You should set up one server
as the master and direct all writes to it. Then configure as many
slaves as you have the budget and rackspace for, and distribute
the reads among the master and the slaves. You can also start the
slaves with the --skip-innodb
,
--skip-bdb
,
--low-priority-updates
, and
--delay-key-write=ALL
options to get speed
improvements on the slave end. In this case, the slave uses
non-transactional MyISAM
tables instead of
InnoDB
and BDB
tables to get
more speed.
Q: What should I do to prepare client code in my own applications to use performance-enhancing replication?
A: If the part of your code that is responsible for database access has been properly abstracted/modularized, converting it to run with a replicated setup should be very smooth and easy. Just change the implementation of your database access to send all writes to the master, and to send reads to either the master or a slave. If your code does not have this level of abstraction, setting up a replicated system gives you the opportunity and motivation to it clean up. You should start by creating a wrapper library or module with the following functions:
safe_writer_connect()
safe_reader_connect()
safe_reader_statement()
safe_writer_statement()
safe_
in each function name means that the
function takes care of handling all error conditions. You can use
different names for the functions. The important thing is to have
a unified interface for connecting for reads, connecting for
writes, doing a read, and doing a write.
You should then convert your client code to use the wrapper library. This may be a painful and scary process at first, but it pays off in the long run. All applications that use the approach just described are able to take advantage of a master/slave configuration, even one involving multiple slaves. The code is much easier to maintain, and adding troubleshooting options is trivial. You just need to modify one or two functions; for example, to log how long each statement took, or which statement among your many thousands gave you an error.
If you have written a lot of code, you may want to automate the conversion task by using the replace utility that comes with standard MySQL distributions, or write your own conversion script. Ideally, your code uses consistent programming style conventions. If not, then you are probably better off rewriting it anyway, or at least going through and manually regularizing it to use a consistent style.
Q: When and how much can MySQL replication improve the performance of my system?
A: MySQL replication is most beneficial for a system with frequent reads and infrequent writes. In theory, by using a single-master/multiple-slave setup, you can scale the system by adding more slaves until you either run out of network bandwidth, or your update load grows to the point that the master cannot handle it.
In order to determine how many slaves you can get before the added
benefits begin to level out, and how much you can improve
performance of your site, you need to know your query patterns,
and to determine empirically by benchmarking the relationship
between the throughput for reads (reads per second, or
max_reads
) and for writes
(max_writes
) on a typical master and a typical
slave. The example here shows a rather simplified calculation of
what you can get with replication for a hypothetical system.
Let's say that system load consists of 10% writes and 90% reads,
and we have determined by benchmarking that
max_reads
is 1200 – 2 ×
max_writes
. In other words, the system can do
1,200 reads per second with no writes, the average write is twice
as slow as the average read, and the relationship is linear. Let
us suppose that the master and each slave have the same capacity,
and that we have one master and N
slaves. Then we have for each server (master or slave):
reads = 1200 – 2 × writes
reads = 9 × writes / (
(reads are split, but writes go to all servers)
N
+ 1)
9 × writes / (
N
+ 1) + 2
× writes = 1200
writes = 1200 / (2 +
9/(
N
+1))
The last equation indicates that the maximum number of writes for
N
slaves, given a maximum possible read
rate of 1,200 per minute and a ratio of nine reads per write.
This analysis yields the following conclusions:
If N
= 0 (which means we have no
replication), our system can handle about 1200/11 = 109 writes
per second.
If N
= 1, we get up to 184 writes
per second.
If N
= 8, we get up to 400 writes
per second.
If N
= 17, we get up to 480 writes
per second.
Eventually, as N
approaches
infinity (and our budget negative infinity), we can get very
close to 600 writes per second, increasing system throughput
about 5.5 times. However, with only eight servers, we increase
it nearly four times.
Note that these computations assume infinite network bandwidth and
neglect several other factors that could turn out to be
significant on your system. In many cases, you may not be able to
perform a computation similar to the one just shown that
accurately predicts what will happen on your system if you add
N
replication slaves. However,
answering the following questions should help you decide if and by
how much replication will improve the performance of your system:
What is the read/write ratio on your system?
How much more write load can one server handle if you reduce the reads?
For how many slaves do you have bandwidth available on your network?
Q: How can I use replication to provide redundancy/high availability?
A: With the currently available features, you would have to set up a master and a slave (or several slaves), and to write a script that monitors the master to check whether it is up. Then instruct your applications and the slaves to change master in case of failure. Some suggestions:
To tell a slave to change its master, use the CHANGE
MASTER TO
statement.
A good way to keep your applications informed as to the
location of the master is by having a dynamic DNS entry for
the master. With bind
you can use
nsupdate
to dynamically update your DNS.
You should run your slaves with the --log-bin
option and without --log-slave-updates
. In
this way, the slave is ready to become a master as soon as you
issue STOP SLAVE
; RESET
MASTER
, and CHANGE MASTER TO
on
the other slaves. For example, assume that you have the
following setup:
WC \ v WC----> M / | \ / | \ v v v S1 S2 S3
M means the master,
S the slaves,
WC the clients issuing
database writes and reads; clients that issue only database
reads are not represented, because they need not switch.
S1,
S2, and
S3 are slaves running with
--log-bin
and without
--log-slave-updates
. Because updates received
by a slave from the master are not logged in the binary log
unless --log-slave-updates
is specified, the
binary log on each slave is empty. If for some reason
M becomes unavailable, you
can pick one of the slaves to become the new master. For
example, if you pick S1, all
WC should be redirected to
S1, and
S2 and
S3 should then replicate from
S1.
Make sure that all slaves have processed any statements in
their relay log. On each slave, issue STOP SLAVE
IO_THREAD
, then check the output of SHOW
PROCESSLIST
until you see Has read all
relay log
. When this is true for all slaves, they
can be reconfigured to the new setup. On the slave
S1 being promoted to become
the master, issue STOP SLAVE
and
RESET MASTER
.
On the other slaves S2 and
S3, use STOP
SLAVE
and CHANGE MASTER TO
MASTER_HOST='S1'
(where 'S1'
represents the real hostname of
S1). To CHANGE
MASTER
, add all information about how to connect to
S1 from
S2 or
S3
(user
,
password
,
port
). In CHANGE
MASTER
, there is no need to specify the name of
S1's binary log or binary log
position to read from: We know it is the first binary log and
position 4, which are the defaults for CHANGE
MASTER
. Finally, use START SLAVE
on S2 and
S3.
Then instruct all WC to direct their statements to S1. From that point on, all updates statements sent by WC to S1 are written to the binary log of S1, which then contains every update statement sent to S1 since M died.
The result is this configuration:
WC / | WC | M(unavailable) \ | \ | v v S1<--S2 S3 ^ | +-------+
When M is up again, you must
issue on it the same CHANGE MASTER
as that
issued on S2 and
S3, so that
M becomes a slave of
S1 and picks up all the
WC writes that it missed
while it was down. To make M
a master again (because it is the most powerful machine, for
example), use the preceding procedure as if
S1 was unavailable and
M was to be the new master.
During this procedure, do not forget to run RESET
MASTER
on M before
making S1,
S2, and
S3 slaves of
M. Otherwise, they may pick
up old WC writes from before
the point at which M became
unavailable.
Q: How do I tell which format I'm currently running (row-based or statement-based)?
A: By issuing this statement:
mysql> SHOW VARIABLES LIKE "%binlog_format%";
Q: How do I tell the slave to use row-based replication?
A: The slave automatically knows which format it should use.
Advantages of statement-based replication are:
Proven technology (existed in MySQL since 3.23).
Smaller log files (when using updates or deletes that affects many rows, much smaller log files). Because log files are smaller, they take up less storage space and are faster to back up.
Log files contain all statements that made any changes, which allow them to be used to audit the database.
Log files can be used for point-in-time recovery, not just for replication purposes. See Section 5.9.3, “Point-in-Time Recovery”.
Slave may be a newer version of MySQL with a different row structure.
Disadvantages of statement-based replication are:
Not all UPDATE
statements can be
replicated: Any non-deterministic behavior, for example when
using random functions in an SQL statement, is hard to
replicate when using statement-based replication. When using a
non-deterministic user-defined function (UDF), it is not
possible to replicate the result using statement-based
replication, while row-based replication will just replicate
the value returned by the UDF.
Statements that use a UDF (user defined function) which is non-deterministic (value depends on other things than the given parameters) cannot be replicated properly.
Statements that use one of the following functions cannot be replicated properly:
LOAD_FILE()
UUID()
USER()
FOUND_ROWS()
All other functions are replicated correctly (including
RAND()
, NOW()
,
LOAD DATA INFILE
, and so forth).
INSERT … SELECT
requires more
row-level locks than with row-level replication.
UPDATE
statements that require a table scan
(that is don't use indexes in the WHERE
clause) have to lock more rows than with row-level
replication.
For InnoDB
: An INSERT
statement that uses auto_increment
will
block other non-conflicting INSERT
statements.
Slower to apply data on slave for complex queries.
Stored functions (not stored procedures) will execute with the
same NOW()
value as the calling statement.
(This may be regarded both as a bad and a good thing.)
Deterministic UDFs (user-defined functions) must be applied on the slaves.
When getting something wrong on the slave, the difference between master and slave will grow with time.
Tables have to be (almost) identical on master and slave.
Advantages of row-level replication are:
Everything can be replicated; safest form of replication. Note
that currently, DDL (data definition language) statements such
as CREATE TABLE
are replicated using
statement-based replication, while DML (data manipulation
language) statements, as well as GRANT
and
REVOKE
statements, are replicated using
row-based-replication. For statements like CREATE
… SELECT
, a CREATE
statement is generated from the table definition and
replicated statement-based, while the row insertions are
replicated row-based.
Same technology as most other database management systems (easier to explain to database administrators used to other systems).
In many cases, faster to apply data on the slave on tables with primary keys.
Less locks needed (thus higher concurrency) on the master for:
INSERT … SELECT
INSERT
statements with
auto_increment
UPDATE
or DELETE
statements with WHERE
clauses that
don't use keys or don't change most of the examined rows.
Less locks on the slave for any INSERT
,
UPDATE
, or DELETE
statement.
It's possible to add multiple threads to apply data on the slave in the future (works better on SMP machines).
Disadvantages of row-level replication are:
Bigger log files (much bigger in some cases).
Binary log will contain data for large statements that were rolled back.
When using row-based replication to replicate a statement (for
example, an UPDATE
or
DELETE
statement), each changed row has to
be written to the binary log. In contrast, when using
statement-based replication only the statement is written to
the binary log. If the statement changes a lot of rows,
row-based replication may write significantly more data to the
binary log. In these cases the binary log will be locked for
longer times to write the data, which may cause concurrency
problems.
Deterministic UDFs that generate big BLOB
s
will be notably slower to replicate.
One can't examine the logs to see what statements were executed.
One can't see on the slave what statements were received from the master and executed.
If you have followed the instructions, and your replication setup is not working, first check the following:
Check the error log for messages. Many users have lost time by not doing this early enough after encountering problems.
Is the master logging to the binary log? Check with
SHOW MASTER STATUS
. If it is,
Position
is non-zero. If not, verify that
you are running the master with the
log-bin
and server-id
options.
Is the slave running? Use SHOW SLAVE
STATUS
to check whether the
Slave_IO_Running
and
Slave_SQL_Running
values are both
Yes
. If not, verify the options that were
used when starting the slave server.
If the slave is running, did it establish a connection to
the master? Use SHOW PROCESSLIST
, find
the I/O and SQL threads and check their
State
column to see how they display. See
Section 6.4, “Replication Implementation Details”. If the
I/O thread state says Connecting to
master
, verify the privileges for the replication
user on the master, master hostname, your DNS setup, whether
the master is actually running, and whether it is reachable
from the slave.
If the slave was running previously but has stopped, the reason usually is that some statement that succeeded on the master failed on the slave. This should never happen if you have taken a proper snapshot of the master, and never modified the data on the slave outside of the slave thread. If it does, it is a bug or you have encountered one of the known replication limitations described in Section 6.8, “Replication Features and Known Problems”. If it is a bug, see Section 6.12.2, “How to Report Replication Bugs or Problems”, for instructions on how to report it.
If a statement that succeeded on the master refuses to run on the slave, and it is not feasible to do a full database resynchronization (that is, to delete the slave's database and copy a new snapshot from the master), try the following:
Determine whether the slave's table is different from
the master's. Try to understand how this happened. Then
make the slave's table identical to the master's and run
START SLAVE
.
If the preceding step does not work or does not apply, try to understand whether it would be safe to make the update manually (if needed) and then ignore the next statement from the master.
If you decide that you can skip the next statement from the master, issue the following statements:
mysql>SET GLOBAL SQL_SLAVE_SKIP_COUNTER =
mysql>n
;START SLAVE;
The value of n
should be 1 if
the next statement from the master does not use
AUTO_INCREMENT
or
LAST_INSERT_ID()
. Otherwise, the
value should be 2. The reason for using a value of 2 for
statements that use AUTO_INCREMENT
or
LAST_INSERT_ID()
is that they take
two events in the binary log of the master.
If you are sure that the slave started out perfectly synchronized with the master, and that no one has updated the tables involved outside of the slave thread, then presumably the discrepancy is the result of a bug. If you are running the most recent version, please report the problem. If you are running an older version of MySQL, try upgrading to the latest production release.
When you have determined that there is no user error involved, and replication still either does not work at all or is unstable, it is time to send us a bug report. We need to obtain as much information as possible from you to be able to track down the bug. Please spend some time and effort in preparing a good bug report.
If you have a repeatable test case that demonstrates the bug, please enter it into our bugs database at http://bugs.mysql.com/. If you have a “phantom” problem (one that you cannot duplicate at will), then use the following procedure:
Verify that no user error is involved. For example, if you update the slave outside of the slave thread, the data goes out of sync, and you can have unique key violations on updates. In this case, the slave thread stops and waits for you to clean up the tables manually to bring them in sync. This is not a replication problem. It is a problem with outside interference causing replication to fail.
Run the slave with the --log-slave-updates
and --log-bin
options. These options cause
the slave to log the updates that it receives from the
master into its own binary logs.
Save all evidence before resetting the replication state. If we have no information or only sketchy information, it becomes difficult or impossible for us to track down the problem. The evidence you should collect is:
All binary logs from the master
All binary logs from the slave
The output of SHOW MASTER STATUS
from
the master at the time you discovered the problem
The output of SHOW SLAVE STATUS
from
the master at the time you discovered the problem
Error logs from the master and the slave
Use mysqlbinlog to examine the binary logs. The following should be helpful to find the problem query, for example:
shell>mysqlbinlog -j pos_from_slave_status \
/path/to/log_from_slave_status
| head
Once you have collected the evidence for the problem, try to isolate it as a separate test case first. Then enter the problem into our bugs database at http://bugs.mysql.com/ with as much information as possible.
Q: How do I tell which format I'm currently running (row-based or statement-based)?
A: By issuing this statement:
mysql> SHOW VARIABLES LIKE "%binlog_format%";
Q: How do I tell the slave to use row-based replication?
A: The slave automatically knows which format it should use.
When multiple servers are configured as replication masters, special steps must be taken to prevent key collisions when using auto_increment, otherwise multiple masters may attempt to use the same auto_increment value when inserting rows.
The two server variables
auto_increment_increment
and
auto_increment_offset
help to accommodate
multi-master replication with AUTO_INCREMENT
columns. Each of these variables has a default (and minimum)
value of 1, and a maximum value of 65,535.
By setting non-conflicting values for these variables, servers
in a multi-master configuration will not use conflicting
AUTO_INCREMENT
values when inserting new rows
into the same table.
These two variables effect AUTO_INCREMENT
column behavior as follows:
auto_increment_increment
controls the
interval by which the column value is incremented. For
example:
mysql>SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'auto_inc%';
+--------------------------+-------+ | Variable_name | Value | +--------------------------+-------+ | auto_increment_increment | 1 | | auto_increment_offset | 1 | +--------------------------+-------+ 2 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql>CREATE TABLE autoinc1 (col INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec) mysql>SET @auto_increment_increment=10;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql>SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'auto_inc%';
+--------------------------+-------+ | Variable_name | Value | +--------------------------+-------+ | auto_increment_increment | 10 | | auto_increment_offset | 1 | +--------------------------+-------+ 2 rows in set (0.01 sec) mysql>INSERT INTO autoinc1 VALUES (NULL), (NULL), (NULL), (NULL);
Query OK, 4 rows affected (0.00 sec) Records: 4 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0 mysql>SELECT col FROM autoinc1;
+-----+ | col | +-----+ | 1 | | 11 | | 21 | | 31 | +-----+ 4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
(Note how SHOW VARIABLES
is used here to
obtain the current values for these variables.)
auto_increment_offset
determines the
starting point for the AUTO_INCREMENT
column value. This affects how many masters you can have in
your replication setup (i.e. setting this value to 10 means
your setup can support up to ten servers).
Consider the following, assuming that these commands are executed during the same session as the previous example:
mysql>SET @auto_increment_offset=5;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql>SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'auto_inc%';
+--------------------------+-------+ | Variable_name | Value | +--------------------------+-------+ | auto_increment_increment | 10 | | auto_increment_offset | 5 | +--------------------------+-------+ 2 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql>CREATE TABLE autoinc2 (col INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.06 sec) mysql>INSERT INTO autoinc2 VALUES (NULL), (NULL), (NULL), (NULL);
Query OK, 4 rows affected (0.00 sec) Records: 4 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0 mysql>SELECT col FROM autoinc2;
+-----+ | col | +-----+ | 5 | | 15 | | 25 | | 35 | +-----+ 4 rows in set (0.02 sec)
For additional information see Section 5.3.3, “Server System Variables”.